
Negotiation
Update
11 04 08
CANZ ATTENDS AUSTRALIAN PRISON
UNION SEMINAR
CANZ officials were invited to participate in a
PRISON OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA Seminar held in
CANZ National secretary
The biggest problem currently facing the Australian
Unions is the Labour Governments proposed move from State based Collective Agreements
to what will
potentially be a Federal Award. Because there is such a wide variety
of terms and conditions State by State, the translation from State conditions
to Federal conditions will be a lengthy and complex exercise.
The
The Australian Unions and CANZ have committed to continuing
dialogue and exchanging information on a wide range of issues of common
interest.
NEGOTIATIONS
RESTART NEXT WEEK FOR PRISON SERVICE COLLECTIVE AND ACRP SITE COLLECTIVE.
The CANZ Negotiation Team will meet with the Prison
Service Negotiation Team in
The outstanding reasons for the rejection were the
length of the term, and the percentages being offered.
The negotiations for the ACRP Collective Agreement
will also recommence on Thursday 17 April. The ACRP site negotiations will
continue to pursue issues surrounding the 12 hour shifts worked on that site,
including short staffing, poor rostering practices and no rewards for working
12 hour shifts.
Friday 18 April has also been set aside by the
union and the Department to revisit any issues raised
at either negotiation.
A full report to CANZ Members regarding any
progress made at either of these negotiations will be made by a further UPDATE.
ps: CANZ understands the PSA will
meet with the Department on the Saturday following our 3 days of talks.
RECENT HISTORY LESSONS.
ACRP.
It is probably a timely reminder that 12 Hour
Shifts were introduced into the New Zealand Prison Service by way of the ACRP
Site in late 90’s early 00’s.
The Private Prison Contractor, Australian Correctional
Management (ACM), also known as GEO, was given the opportunity by the then
National Government to operate a Private Prison in
The PSA, without any members
onsite, signed a deal with ACM allowing 12 hour shifts to be worked at ACRP,
along with wages that were well below the rates paid in the Public Prison
Service.
CANZ Officials attempted to represent Officers on
that site but were denied entry by ACM Management and the
The legal proceedings of that case were the most
that CANZ had ever spent in any one issue at that time.
CANZ then organized the site into a 100% CANZ Union
site.
Following the election of the Labour Government in
1999, ACRP was later transferred into the Public Prison Service.
During the transition process, CANZ negotiated all
of terms and conditions that Public Prison Officers receive, including big
increases in wages, into the ACRP Agreement.
The exception was the 12 hour shifts, which the
Department of Corrections insisted on keeping. They were legally able to do this
under the Greenfields provisions of the Employment Relations Act.
CANZ has insisted on keeping ACRP on a separate
site specific Collective Agreement until such time as the Department addresses
the 12 hour shift issues.
ACRP remains a 100% CANZ Organised site.
THE MUSTER CRISIS.
Between 2004 and 2006 when the Prison Service was
experiencing what is now referred to as the “Muster Crisis”, the PSA signed a
Variation to the Agreement which would allow the Department to use Casuals
behind the wire (court cells), and introduce 12 hour shifts within the Prison
Service.
CANZ steadfastly refused to allow this to happen
and after a number of standoffs with the Department, managed to negotiate the “Muster
Payments” for all CANZ Members which were the forerunner to the wages rates
gained at the 2006 CEA Negotiations.
THE PSA and JOINT BARGAINING
The PSA has put out a recent Newsletter stating
that it has approached CANZ to enter into joint bargaining with the Department
and that CANZ has said NO!
This is not correct reporting of the communication
between the CANZ Advocate and the PSA.
The CANZ Advocate told the PSA Officials that CANZ
was prepared to attend facilitated talks on this matter, as has been arranged
on 2 previous occasions when CANZ has requested the then NZCTU President Ross
Wilson to facilitate talks between the parties.
This same offer has been made again, by CANZ, although
CANZ has suggested a mediator could be used instead of the NZCTU, because CANZ
perceives the leadership of the NZCTU as now having a strong PSA influence, and
as a policy the NZCTU appears to favour big Unions over the interests of
smaller Unions.
But also bearing in mind the “RECENT HISTORY
LESSONS” above, the question has to be asked “Why would we bother”?
Yet even with this history and the recent activity
we continue to try to engage our CTU comrades, with a goal to work
constructively together for the benefit of our members.
CANZ National Executive